Is injection moulding cheaper than 3D printing?

When comparing injection molding and 3D printing, it’s important to understand that each method has its unique advantages and disadvantages. The cost-effectiveness of each method depends on various factors such as production volume, material requirements, and specific application needs. Let’s delve deeper into the comparison between injection molding and 3D printing to determine when each method is more cost-effective.

Injection Molding

Injection molding is a manufacturing process used for producing parts by injecting molten material into a mold. This method is particularly suited for high-volume production and offers several distinct advantages and disadvantages.


  1. Economies of Scale: Injection molding is highly cost-effective for large production runs. The initial cost of creating the mold is spread across a large number of parts, significantly reducing the per-unit cost as the volume increases. For example, if you produce thousands or millions of units, the cost per part can be very low.
  2. Speed and Efficiency: Once the mold is created and set up, injection molding can produce parts very quickly and efficiently. The cycle time for each part can be as short as a few seconds, making it an ideal choice for mass production.
  3. Material Variety: Injection molding allows for a wide range of materials, including various plastics, elastomers, and thermosetting polymers. This versatility enables manufacturers to select materials with specific properties that meet the exact requirements of the product, such as strength, flexibility, and chemical resistance.
  4. High Precision and Repeatability: Injection molding produces parts with high precision and consistency. The process ensures that each part is nearly identical, which is crucial for applications requiring tight tolerances and high-quality standards.
  5. Surface Finish and Detailing: Parts produced by injection molding often have excellent surface finishes and fine details, reducing or eliminating the need for post-processing.


  1. High Initial Costs: The creation of molds is expensive and time-consuming. The cost of designing and manufacturing a mold can range from a few thousand to hundreds of thousands of dollars, depending on the complexity and size. This high initial investment makes injection molding less cost-effective for low-volume production.
  2. Lead Time: The process of designing, manufacturing, and testing molds can take several weeks to months. This lead time can be a drawback for projects requiring rapid turnaround or iterative prototyping.

3D Printing

3D printing, or additive manufacturing, is a process of creating objects by adding material layer by layer based on digital models. This method is highly flexible and well-suited for low-volume production, prototyping, and custom designs.


  1. Low Initial Costs: 3D printing does not require molds, which eliminates the high upfront costs associated with injection molding. This makes it an affordable option for producing small quantities or individual prototypes.
  2. Flexibility and Customization: 3D printing excels in producing complex geometries and intricate designs that would be difficult or impossible with traditional manufacturing methods. It allows for easy customization and rapid adjustments to the design, making it ideal for bespoke products and iterative development.
  3. Rapid Prototyping: 3D printing enables quick production of prototypes, allowing designers and engineers to test and refine their ideas without the delay and cost of mold creation. This accelerates the development cycle and supports innovation.
  4. Minimal Waste: As an additive process, 3D printing generates minimal waste compared to subtractive manufacturing methods. Material is only used where needed, making it a more sustainable option for certain applications.
  5. On-Demand Production: 3D printing allows for on-demand production, reducing the need for large inventories and storage space. This can be particularly beneficial for small businesses and custom manufacturers.


  1. Higher Per-Unit Costs: For large-scale production, 3D printing is generally more expensive per unit compared to injection molding. The slower production speeds and higher material costs contribute to this higher per-unit cost.
  2. Material Limitations: While the range of materials available for 3D printing is expanding, it is still limited compared to injection molding. Additionally, the mechanical properties of 3D-printed parts may not always match those produced by injection molding, which can affect the suitability for certain applications.
  3. Surface Finish and Strength: Parts produced by 3D printing may require additional post-processing to achieve the desired surface finish and mechanical strength. This can add time and cost to the overall production process.

Cost Comparison

  • Low-Volume Production: For small quantities or prototypes, 3D printing is usually cheaper due to lower initial setup costs and greater flexibility. It allows for quick adjustments and iterative development without the need for expensive molds.
  • High-Volume Production: For mass production, injection molding is more cost-effective. Despite the high initial mold costs, the low per-unit cost and high production speed make it the preferred choice for producing large quantities of parts.


Injection molding and 3D printing each have their own strengths and weaknesses, and the choice between them depends on the specific needs of the project. Injection molding is typically cheaper and more efficient for large-scale production due to economies of scale, faster production rates, and material versatility. In contrast, 3D printing is more cost-effective for low-volume production, rapid prototyping, and projects requiring high customization and complex geometries.

When deciding between injection molding and 3D printing, consider factors such as production volume, material requirements, lead time, and the complexity of the design. By carefully evaluating these factors, businesses can choose the most suitable and cost-effective manufacturing method for their specific application.